- New common/misc/tmux-launch-agent skill with detect-agent script and agents-seed.md (moved from engineering/setup-skills) - implement-issue simplified: delegates agent dispatch to tmux-launch-agent instead of inlining it - setup-skills stripped of Section E (agent CLI config) - New in-progress/agent-handoff skill using tmux-launch-agent - PKM skills simplified: conversation-summary and pkm-curation rewritten with leaner process, crit streamlined - knowledge-gardener removed (moved to common/in-progress/) - All READMEs updated to match
196 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
196 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: pkm-curation
|
|
description: Curate an Obsidian vault — classify notes, normalize frontmatter, add wikilinks, extract atomic notes. Use when curating, batch-processing, reviewing, or doing a serendipity pick.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# PKM Curation
|
|
|
|
Use this skill when working inside a Markdown-first vault that values curation over collection.
|
|
|
|
## Goals
|
|
|
|
- Turn raw notes into reusable atomic notes.
|
|
- Keep new notes consistent with vault conventions.
|
|
- Strengthen the link graph with meaningful `[[wikilinks]]`.
|
|
- Extract atomic notes from long or mixed-topic notes.
|
|
|
|
## Read This First
|
|
|
|
- Read `AGENTS.md` in the current repo scope before editing notes.
|
|
- Read `references/vault-conventions.md` when normalizing metadata, deciding note types, or choosing folders.
|
|
- Read `references/agent-integration.md` when running this skill through an agent.
|
|
- Keep changes small and reviewable.
|
|
- Keep file operations local to the vault unless the user explicitly asks otherwise.
|
|
|
|
## Search
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Search by filename
|
|
fd --type f ".md" "path/to/obsidian-vault" | rg -i "keyword"
|
|
|
|
# Search by content
|
|
rg -l "keyword" "path/to/obsidian-vault" --include "*.md"
|
|
|
|
# Find backlinks to a note
|
|
rg -l "\\[\\[Note Title\\]\\]" "path/to/obsidian-vault" --include "*.md"
|
|
|
|
# Find index notes
|
|
fd --type f "Index" "path/to/obsidian-vault"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Rules
|
|
|
|
- Prefer curation over reorganization.
|
|
- Do not move, rename, or delete many notes at once unless the user asks.
|
|
- Do not invent links based only on shared words.
|
|
- Preserve the user's voice unless the user asks for a rewrite.
|
|
- Keep source material and evergreen ideas separate when possible.
|
|
- Treat `Inbox/` as temporary capture, not long-term storage.
|
|
- Preserve all command blocks, code snippets, configuration directives, and
|
|
step-by-step instructions verbatim. Do not summarize or condense them.
|
|
- For reference/source notes: add a brief overview at the top, but keep the
|
|
original commands and details intact below. Completeness > brevity.
|
|
- Read every file completely before moving, renaming, or modifying it. Do not rely on head/tail, heading-only scans, or partial reads to judge a file's content.
|
|
|
|
## Note-Type Heuristics
|
|
|
|
### Inbox note
|
|
|
|
Use when the note is raw capture, partial thinking, copied text, or an unprocessed link dump.
|
|
|
|
Actions:
|
|
- clean obvious structure issues
|
|
- add frontmatter if missing
|
|
- classify for later promotion
|
|
- avoid over-polishing unless requested
|
|
|
|
### Source note
|
|
|
|
Use when the note is based on an article, video, book, paper, transcript, or other external material.
|
|
|
|
Actions:
|
|
- keep source context intact
|
|
- summarize key takeaways
|
|
- extract reusable ideas into separate atomic notes
|
|
- link to related concepts and projects
|
|
|
|
### Atomic note
|
|
|
|
Use when the note captures one durable idea, concept, claim, pattern, or insight.
|
|
|
|
Actions:
|
|
- ensure one main idea per note
|
|
- make the title concept-focused
|
|
- add links to neighboring ideas
|
|
- keep it concise and self-contained
|
|
|
|
### Project note
|
|
|
|
Use when the note supports active work, planning, resources, decisions, or tasks.
|
|
|
|
Actions:
|
|
- preserve project context
|
|
- link tasks to the project note
|
|
- avoid turning active project logistics into evergreen notes unless there is a reusable insight
|
|
|
|
### Daily note
|
|
|
|
Use when the note is date-based and captures activity, learning, tasks, or reflection for a single day.
|
|
|
|
Actions:
|
|
- preserve chronology
|
|
- link out to durable notes rather than stuffing ideas into the daily note
|
|
|
|
## Linking Guidance
|
|
|
|
Add links only when they express one of these relationships:
|
|
|
|
- concept to broader concept
|
|
- source note to extracted idea
|
|
- project note to relevant knowledge note
|
|
- daily note to work done or ideas learned
|
|
- sibling concepts that genuinely inform one another
|
|
|
|
When linking, prefer existing notes over creating speculative new ones.
|
|
|
|
## Extraction Guidance
|
|
|
|
Extract atomic notes when a note contains:
|
|
|
|
- multiple durable ideas
|
|
- a strong claim hidden in raw notes
|
|
- a reusable method, distinction, or definition
|
|
- a concept that should be linked from many places
|
|
|
|
Keep extracted notes short. One note, one idea.
|
|
|
|
## Common Tasks
|
|
|
|
### Curate one note
|
|
|
|
1. Inspect the target note and locate its file in the vault.
|
|
2. Identify the note type: inbox, source, atomic, project, daily, or reference.
|
|
3. Normalize frontmatter and basic structure.
|
|
4. Clarify the title if vague or timestamp-like.
|
|
5. Tighten headings and summary; distill if it mixes too many ideas.
|
|
6. Inspect nearby related notes, then add a few strong `[[wikilinks]]`.
|
|
7. If the note contains multiple durable ideas, extract 1-3 atomic notes.
|
|
8. Suggest moving only if the destination is clearly better.
|
|
9. Patch the note in place and return a short summary of edits.
|
|
|
|
**Completion Criterion**: Note inspected, classified, normalized, linked, and patched, with a summary returned to the user.
|
|
|
|
### Curate an inbox batch
|
|
|
|
- process a small batch, usually 5-10 notes
|
|
- classify each note
|
|
- normalize metadata
|
|
- suggest which notes should stay raw, become source notes, or become atomic notes
|
|
- avoid large folder reshuffles unless the pattern is clear
|
|
- enumerate a small set of `Inbox/` notes
|
|
- process them one at a time
|
|
- stop and summarize after each batch
|
|
|
|
**Completion Criterion**: Each note in the batch classified and normalized, with a summary returned after the batch.
|
|
|
|
### Review recent notes
|
|
|
|
- inspect recently edited notes
|
|
- identify missing links and vague titles
|
|
- flag notes with mixed concerns
|
|
- suggest a small set of follow-up curation actions
|
|
- search by recent filenames or recent folders when file metadata is available
|
|
- keep edits conservative and return a review summary
|
|
|
|
**Completion Criterion**: Recently edited notes inspected, missing links and mixed concerns flagged, with a review summary returned.
|
|
|
|
### Serendipity review
|
|
|
|
- choose a note from the vault
|
|
- summarize it briefly
|
|
- compare it to the user's current topic or active project
|
|
- suggest only high-confidence connections
|
|
- pick one note from a user-specified folder or from curated folders only
|
|
- avoid randomizing across obviously raw capture unless the user asks for that
|
|
|
|
**Completion Criterion**: One curated note chosen, briefly summarized, compared to active topic, with only high-confidence connections suggested.
|
|
|
|
## Output Style
|
|
|
|
When responding to the user:
|
|
|
|
- state what kind of note you think it is
|
|
- summarize the curation changes you made or recommend
|
|
- list any extracted notes to create
|
|
- list meaningful links added or suggested
|
|
- mention any move or rename separately before doing it
|
|
- name the file or files touched
|
|
- separate completed edits from suggested next actions
|
|
- call out anything that still needs user confirmation
|
|
|
|
## If You Need More Context
|
|
|
|
If the vault structure is unclear, inspect folders and a few nearby notes before editing.
|
|
If note conventions appear to conflict, follow the most local `AGENTS.md` instructions in scope.
|
|
Don't guess at user preferences. When in doubt, ask the user before making big changes or suggesting speculative links.
|